Dear Fellow Christians, here’s the PROOF, that what you have is not the Bible, and the KJV is the inspired word of God in the English language, and the only Bible version that can truthfully be called such………
PRESERVATION
Jesus says in Matthew 4:4 and Luke 4:4 that “Man shall not live by bread alone but by
EVERY WORD of God.”
Proverbs 30:5 says “EVERY WORD of God is pure.”
Therefore since EVERY word of God is vitally important, you’d better make sure you’re
Version of the ‘Bible’ contains EVERY word, in its pure form.
The Bible says over and over that God would preserve his word forever,
PSALM 12:6-7 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of
earth, purified seven times.
Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation
forever. (KJV)
(Even if God preserved 99.99% of his words then this promise is a lie or else he is
incapable of preserving them.)
MATTHEW 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one
tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. (KJV)
1PETER 1:25 But the word of the Lord endureth (endures) forever…… (KJV)
MATTHEW 24:35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass
away. (KJV)
According to God himself throughout all generations the perfect word of God was here
on earth without error, without omission, and without addition.
Most modern day ‘Scholars’ and Christians reject this concept of preservation. Ask
your Pastor and he’ll probably say that God failed to preserve his word, and only the
“original writings”, of the Bible’s individual books were inspired.
He’ll probably tell you that ALL copies of the Bible today have errors and are different to what was originally written down. In this, he makes God a liar (see Romans 3:4).
Paul says to Timothy in around AD 67 that He possesses the “HOLY SCRIPTURES” Paul could not have been speaking about the original writings of these scriptures which were written between 500-2000 years before Timothy was born. Paul says that these same “HOLY SCRIPTURES” are inspired by God,
2TIMOTHY 3:15-16 And that from a child thou hast known the holy Scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
The doctrine of the people that translate modern versions, the people that use modern versions and the people that write footnotes for modern versions is that, the inspired, infallible, inerrant, word of the living God is now lost and we only have about 95-97% of the Bible today.
According to the Bible itself, God’s exact words have been preserved throughout all
generations. Christians that believe in one Bible version (KJV) are the only Christian
group on earth that still believe they hold the preserved word of God in full, without
error.
MANUSCRIPTS
It is well known that throughout the centuries since its existence the Catholic Church has been desperately trying to corrupt the Bible to bring it into agreement with it’s apostate beliefs (for example adding the Apocrypha to the Old Testament canon to try and justify doctrines such as ‘praying for the dead’ and ‘saints as mediators’.)
Despite this obvious treachery, all modern versions of the Bible (NWT, ASV, NASV, NIV, RSV, NRV, REB, Living Bible, Jerusalem Bible, Amplified Version, Good News for Modern man etc.) translate their New Testament from the Westcott and Hort reconstruction of the Greek text. Brooke F Westcott and Fenton J Hort reconstructed their text from TWO 4th century Catholic Greek manuscripts, ‘Vaticanus’ (B) and ‘Sinaiticus’(Aleph).
The 5200 Greek manuscripts of the majority text have been mainly ignored in the new translations. The NKJV is the only exception but this is a merge of the two text types.
UNDISPUTED FACTS concerning Westcott and Hort are,
- Westcott was a firm believer in Mary worship.
- Westcott rejected the literal account of creation as given in Genesis.
- Westcott rejected a literal heaven and the second coming of Christ.
- Westcott confessed to being a communist by nature.
- Hort believed in keeping Catholic sacraments.
- Hort believed in the washing away of original sin from baby sprinkling.
- Hort rejected the infallibility of the Bible.
- Hort rejected the Trinity.
- Hort didn’t believe in Angels either.
- Both rejected a literal Hell.
- Both men were involved in the Occult; they started ‘The Hermes Club’ in 1845 and the ‘Ghostly Guild’ in 1851. Hort joined a secret club called ‘The Apostles’ also in 1851. All these clubs believed in NECROMANCY, strictly forbidden by the Bible.
UNDISPUTED FACTS concerning the two Catholic 4th century manuscripts, from which they got their Greek text, are,
- ‘Vaticanus’ was found in a library in the Vatican.
- It contains the Apocrypha in the Old Testament.
- The manuscript omits the entire books of 1Timothy (No doubt because of anti-catholic verses in 1:4, 2:5, 3:2-4, 4:4 and 6:3-5), 2Timothy (No doubt because of anti-catholic verses in 1:9, 2:15, 3:5, 3:15-16), Titus (No doubt because of anti-catholic verses in 1:6-7, 1:16 and 3:5) and Revelation (No doubt because of Revelation 17 where Rome is judged)
- In ‘Vaticanus’ the Book of Hebrews conveniently stops at 9:14, omitting verses 9:22, 9:25-28, 10:10-14 these are the verses that totally destroy the notion of the ‘mass’.
- ‘Vaticanus’ is a catholic corruption of the Bible.
- ‘Sinaiticus’ was found in a monastery in Egypt, in a RUBBISH BIN. It was about to be destroyed by the monks because it didn’t match up with the standard Bible text, when a German scholar stole it and brought it to Europe.
- It also contains the Apocrypha.
- ‘Sinaiticus’ contains the ‘Epistle of Barnabas’, ‘Shepherd of Hermas’ and ‘the letters of Clement’ in its New Testament, all four books teach unbiblical doctrines and that’s why we don’t have them as part of our canon.
- ‘Sinaiticus’ is also a catholic corruption of the Bible.
Luther, Wycliffe and other reformers ignored ‘Vaticanus’ as a corrupt Catholic PERversion of the Bible when they were translating the Scriptures (‘Sinaiticus’ wasn’t discovered yet) which it clearly was.
It is abundantly clear the Catholics had corrupted the Bible in the 3rd and 4th century and these two manuscripts are just a continuation of this corruption. There is also evidence in the modern Bibles that are translated from their two perverted manuscripts,
It is agreed as truth that one must believe on Christ before he is baptized but Catholics completely reject this doctrine and baptize babies, who cannot believe. 5000 Greek manuscripts contain this truth in Acts 8:37 (as preserved in the KJV) but Catholics removed it from the Bible in direct violation of Revelation 33:19, hence it is missing in ‘Sinaiticus’ and hence all the modern corruptions that take their translation from it, it is very OBVIOUS,
Acts 8:36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the
eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?
Acts 8:37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he
answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
Acts 8:38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into
the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him. (KJV)
Acts 8:36 As they travelled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, “Look, here is water. Why shouldn’t I be baptized?”
Acts 8:38 And he ordered the chariot to stop. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and Philip baptized him. (NIV)
It is no surprise that verse 37 is missing in all the modern versions, Catholic corruptions are all they are, not Bibles.
It is because of these corrupt manuscripts that 1Timothy 3:16 says ‘ “He” was manifest in the flesh’ rather than ‘God was manifest in the flesh’ (KJV).
And it is because of these manuscripts that modern Bible translations remove the verses they remove, Even though God said,
DEUTERONOMY 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish aught from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
And
REVELATION 22:19 … if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this
prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city,
and from the things which are written in this book.
Even older manuscripts than ‘Vaticanus’ and ‘Sinaiticus’ support the KJV readings, such as the ‘Pashitta’ 145 AD and the ‘Old Latin’ 157 AD. Manuscripts such as The ‘Old Syriac’ and The ‘Armenian Bible’ are from around 400 AD and these also support the KJV readings.
The KJV is the only version today that did not translate their Bible from the afore-mentioned 2 Catholic perversions.
CONSPIRATOR TRANSLATORS
2PETER 3:15-16 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures, unto their own destruction. (KJV)
These verses prophesy exactly what is happening today, people don’t understand the King James Version and instead of reading it they’d rather change the Bible to suit themselves.
Modern translators have completely ‘wrested’ (twisted) the Bible text, they have messed with and corrupted the word of God, changing and watering down verses that they don’t like.
For example, Psalm 12:6-7,
Obviously these scholars don’t believe God can preserve his word (that’s why they like to call verses “spurious” and why they put two conflicting endings on the Gospel of Mark) that’s why they decided to change Psalm 12:7 so that it no longer promises absolute preservation of the Bible text. Observe,
PSALM 12:6-7 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of
earth, purified seven times.
Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation
forever. (KJV)
PSALM 12:6-7 The promises of the LORD are promises that are pure, silver refined in a furnace on the ground, purified seven times. Do thou, O LORD protect us, guard us ever from this generation. (RSV)
Other versions say something similar, corrupting the verse so that it talks of preserving people instead of God’s words.
NIV....... you will keep us safe
NASB... Thou wilt preserve him
NRSV... You, O Lord, will protect us
REB...... you are our protector
LB......... you will forever preserve your own
NAB...... You, O Lord, will keep us
They have also corrupted many other verses that deal with the word of God,
Such as Luke 4:4 where Jesus says, “man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.”
In the new versions Jesus merely says “man shall not live by bread alone”. There can only be one answer as to why the ending of the verse has been chopped off when one considers that, aside from bits of verses there has been up to 25 WHOLE VERSES taken out of the modern versions. Clearly corrupters have torn out the rest of the verse because they don’t like references to EVERY word of God.
(Or references to the word of God in general, because they’ve messed with it)
1PETER 2:2 As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow
thereby: (KJV)
1PETER 2:2 Like newborn babies, crave pure spiritual milk……… (NIV)
ROMANS 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. (KJV)
ROMANS 10:17 Consequently, faith comes from hearing the message, and the
message is heard through the word of Christ. (NIV)
REVELATION 22:19 … if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this
prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city,
and from the things which are written in this book. (KJV)
Try to find the following verses in your modern version. At least some if not most will have been removed
Matt 17:21
Matt 18:11
Matt 23:14
Mark 7:16
Mark 9:44
Mark 9:46
Mark 11:26
Mark 15:28
Luke 17:36
Luke 23:17
John 5:4
Acts 15:34
Acts 24:7
Acts 28:29
Romans 16:24
These and other verses have all been taken out of the Word of God by Catholic conspirators, followed by Westcott and Hort, followed by the crooked translators of your “Bibles”.
With whole verses and parts of verses removed, somewhere in the region of 8% OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IS GONE FROM MODERN VERSIONS OF THE BIBLE.
See the omissions in the Lord’s Prayer for another example.
According to the word of God, the Lord has taken their names out of the Book of Life (Revelation 22:19) and therefore they are condemned to the lake of fire (Revelation 20:15).
But seeing their condemnation, these scholars and others like them have decided to change Revelation 22:19 so that they no longer lose their place in the book of life, observe,
REVELATION 22:19 … if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this
prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city,
and from the things which are written in this book. (KJV)
REVELATION 22:19 And if anyone takes words away from this book of prophecy, God will take from him his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book. (NIV)
It could not be made plainer.
There are other verses in the Bible which warn of those who pervert God’s word but the modern scholars have done their best to get rid of these references to THEM so they won’t be found out by Christians.
2CORINTHIANS 2:17 For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as
of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ. (KJV)
2CORINTHIANS 2:17 For we are not like so many, peddlers of God’s word… (RSV)
MODERN IDEAS INFLUENCED ALL MODERN TRANSLATIONS
We would all agree that in the present day there is a serious lack of the FEAR of God in most people, therefore why should it be so hard to believe that modern Bible scholars have been messing with the Scriptural text, allowing their personal (and modern) opinions to get the Bible to say what they want it to say, and what this modern wicked society wants it to say.
Here’s the proof,
We all know that in the last number of years there has been a wide acceptance of homosexual lifestyles, to the point that if one speaks out against homosexuality they’re considered to be on the same level as a racist. (I hope) You’d agree it is a filthy abominable way of living.
The word of God angrily speaks out against this filthiness, but the modern scholars have once again, without remorse ALTERED the Biblical text to suit themselves and this ungodly culture.
DEUTERONOMY 23:17 There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a
sodomite of the sons of Israel. (KJV)
DEUTERONOMY 23:17 “There shall be no cult prostitute of the daughters of Israel, neither shall there be a cult prostitute of the sons of Israel.”
(RSV)
1KINGS 14:24 And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all
the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel.
(KJV)
1KINGS 14:24 And there were also male cult prostitutes in the land… (RSV)
1KINGS 22:46 ……… Sodomites ……… (KJV)
1KINGS 22:46 ……… Male cult prostitutes ……… (RSV)
2KINGS 23:7 …… Sodomites ……………… (KJV)
2KINGS 23:7 …… Male cult prostitutes …………… (RSV)
Sodomites (homosexuals, Gays or whatever you want to call them) are obviously not the same thing as males who involve themselves in ritualistic prostitution, one of these Bibles is WRONG. The modern versions no longer contain God’s disapproval of the homosexuals (that would just be too offensive, wouldn’t it?).
1KINGS 15:11-12 And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, as did
David his father. And he took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed all the idols that his fathers had made. (KJV)
That certainly wouldn’t go down well in today’s society! The modern translators made it homosexual friendly though,
1KINGS 15:12 He put away the male cult prostitutes out of the land and
removed all the idols that his fathers had made. (RSV)
Also in 1Corinthians 6:9 the NIV changes the word “effeminate” to “male prostitutes” and they’ve taken out “abusers of themselves with mankind” and put in the ‘non-offensive’ “homosexual offenders”. Thus ridding the Bible of any real condemnation of ordinary HOMOSEXUALS.
Is it any wonder churches are ordaining homosexual ministers?
Another modern idea which has influenced modern translations is the idea that Jesus
couldn’t have been born of a Virgin, most liberal scholars and theologians think this
story is a myth, accordingly the translators have cunningly attacked this doctrine with
their bias versions.
In your modern version Joseph is Jesus’ father, the word ‘pater’ was inserted instead of ‘Ioseph’ in Luke 2:33, see also Luke 2:43 in the NIV.
LUKE 2:33-34 And Joseph and his mother marveled at those things which were spoken
of him. And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is
set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken
against; (KJV)
LUKE 2:33-34 The child’s father and mother marveled at what was said about him. Then Simeon blessed them and said to Mary his mother: “This child is destined to
cause the falling and the rising of many in Israel and to be a sign that will be spoken
against. (NIV)
The virgin birth becomes a “young woman” birth in the modern versions.
ISAIAH 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. (KJV)
ISAIAH 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: Behold, a young woman will conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. (RSV)
There’s plenty more evidence, such as the changing of ‘the creation’ details to coincide with modern views etc. but you should be convinced by now. Your ‘Bible’ and every other modern version of the ‘Bible’ on the market is translated from two Catholic manuscripts, which are corruptions of the Biblical text that God inspired, Your ‘Bible’ removes verses that God inspired, Your scholars call into question verses in God’s word even though God said he would preserve his word forever.
Lastly, today’s scholars (without remorse) have twisted God’s words and have tried to bring the Bible into agreement with modern, liberal ideas.
What you have is not the Bible.
No comments:
Post a Comment